↓ Download PDF
Team Empathy  ·  Competitive Teardown

Why Larsen wins
and you don't.

Larsen Jewellery versus Ernesto Buono, page by page

The same market, the same customers, found on ChatGPT

Australia   |   Prepared for William & Ernesto Buono  ·  August 2026

The question this answers

The line in the strategy that prompted this. Larsen's Domain Rating is 48 and yours is 38. Ten points apart. Yet Larsen ranks in the top three for 1,496 keywords and you rank top three for 39. We said that was about how their pages are built. This document is the proof, taken from both sitemaps and from crawling matched pages side by side.
3,064
URLs in Larsen's sitemap, against your 2,014. Similar size, very different shape.
287
keywords Larsen's engagement rings page ranks for
4
keywords your engagement rings page ranks for
10 pts
of Domain Rating separate you. That is not what this is about.

The whole answer in one comparison

Both of you have a page at /engagement-rings. Both target the same market. Here is what each one earns.

Larsen · /engagement-rings
287 keywords
Position 2 for "engagement rings australia". 6,360 organic visits a month from this single page.
  • One H1: "Engagement Rings"
  • 4,193 words, 35 H2s, 28 H3s
  • FAQ schema present
  • Title: Engagement Rings | Made in Australia
Ernesto Buono · /engagement-rings
4 keywords
Best position 11. 48 organic visits a month from the same page type, in the same market.
  • Three H1s, one of them empty, one of them "Filter By:"
  • 1,690 words, 21 H2s, 9 H3s
  • No FAQ schema
  • Title: Engagement Rings Australia | Ernesto Buono Fine Jewellery

Traffic and keyword counts from Ahrefs, Australian market, 11 August 2026. Page anatomy from a live crawl of both pages the same day. Ahrefs Live crawl

This is the maths behind 1,496 against 39. Larsen does not have more pages than you. They have roughly 52 category hubs to your 33. What they have is pages that each rank for 30 to 287 keywords, while yours rank for 4 to 43. Multiply that across every hub and you get their number and yours. The gap is keywords per page, not pages.

Six reasons they win

Reason 01 · the biggest one
Every one of your category pages has multiple H1s. Every one of theirs has exactly one.

We crawled twelve category pages from each site at random. Larsen had exactly one H1 on 12 of 12. You had multiple H1s on 12 of 12. On your emerald cut page the three H1s are an empty one, "Emerald Cut Diamond", and "Filter By:", which is a filter control given the highest heading weight on the page.

An H1 tells a search engine and an AI assistant what the page is about. Yours says three things, one of which is a piece of furniture. This is a template-level fault, so it is one fix applied once, not 2,014 fixes.

Larsen, single H1
12 / 12
You, single H1
0 / 12
Your H1 on emerald cut
"Filter By:"
Reason 02
They answer questions on the page. You list products.

Larsen carries FAQ schema on 9 of 12 category pages. You carry it on 0 of 12, and there is none anywhere on your site. FAQ markup is the single clearest signal to Google and to AI assistants that a page contains answers worth lifting.

The heading shape tells the same story. Larsen averages 16.6 H2s and 22.2 H3s per category page: a document with sections and sub-sections. You average 31.9 H2s and only 8.2 H3s: a flat wall of product names with almost no structure underneath. On your emerald cut page the H2s read "18kt Two-Tone Ring with Emerald Cut Diam…", truncated mid-word. There is no argument on the page for a machine to quote.

Larsen FAQ schema
9 / 12
Your FAQ schema
0 / 12
Larsen H3s per page
22.2
Your H3s per page
8.2
Reason 03
They built an education library. You have three pages.

Larsen has a /learn-about/ hub of 48 pages, structured as a proper tree. Diamonds branches into carat, clarity, colour, cut, certificates and fluorescence. Shapes branches again into ten pages, one each for asscher, cushion, emerald, heart, marquise, oval, pear, princess, radiant and round brilliant. Coloured gemstones has twelve pages. Precious metals has seven. Plus ring size, jewellery care and the Mohs hardness scale.

You have three pages covering diamond education, against 4,730 searches a month and fifteen buyer questions in that territory. This is exactly where AI assistants source their answers, and it is the territory a master jeweller should own outright.

Larsen education pages
48
Your education pages
3
Demand in that territory
4,730 / mo
Reason 04 · the one that matters most commercially
Their second-biggest page is about a city they are not in.

Larsen's number two page by traffic is /engagement-rings/melbourne, at position 2 for "engagement rings melbourne" and 2,518 organic visits a month. They also hold pages for Brisbane, Adelaide, Canberra, Perth and Sydney. Six cities, six pages, built into the URL structure.

You have none. This is the national expansion you are moving towards with Zoom consultations, and your competitor is already taking the traffic for it. The demand is there and it is organised city by city: Australians search "lab grown diamond rings brisbane", "adelaide", "perth", "canberra", "melbourne", "wollongong", "cairns", "hobart", "newcastle" and "geelong".

Larsen city pages
6
Your city pages
0
Their Melbourne page
2,518 / mo
Reason 05
They have a page for every way someone shops. You have a page for every shape.

Your 33 engagement-ring hubs are almost all cuts and stones: emerald, oval, pear, cushion, princess, sapphire, ruby. Good, and necessary. Larsen has those too, and then keeps going with the way people actually search:

  • Budget: /1ct-diamond-rings, /2ct-diamond-rings (position 2 for "1 carat diamond ring", 1,700 a month)
  • Intent: /guide, /how-to-propose-guide, /top-10, /price-guide, /online, /custom, /engraved
  • Comparison: /guide/platinum-vs-white-gold, at position 3 for "what is white gold", 1,200 a month
  • Service: /services/jewellery-remodelling, position 1 for "redesigning jewellery"

That last one is worth pausing on. Resetting an inherited stone is something you do brilliantly and have no page for. Larsen ranks first for it.

They also cover both phrasings of every shape, holding /cushion and /cushion-cut, /oval and /oval-cut, /marquise and /marquise-cut, because people type it both ways.

Reason 06
They control what Google crawls. You show it everything.

Larsen's robots.txt blocks /product/ outright, then allows roughly thirty named diamonds back in. They are deliberately keeping thousands of thin, fast-changing loose-diamond pages out of the index so that crawl attention lands on the pages built to rank. Their blog sits tidily under /blog/, 639 pages, all namespaced.

Your sitemap offers all 2,014 URLs, and 1,612 of them earned zero clicks last quarter. Your 127 articles sit at the root with no hub above them, and your taxonomy overlaps itself: /rings/, /collection/, /jewellery-collection/, /category/ and /new-arrivals/ all describe the same stock in different ways, so your own pages compete with each other.

What is not the difference

Three things we checked and ruled out, because it matters that the diagnosis is right before anyone spends money on the wrong fix.

The usual suspectVerdictWhat the data says
Page speed Not the cause Larsen also fails Core Web Vitals: Lighthouse 66 on mobile, LCP 4.2 seconds, blocking time 798ms. They hold 1,496 top-three rankings anyway. Your 14-second LCP is much worse and still worth fixing for the customers who bounce, but speed is not why they outrank you.
Internal linking Not the cause Near identical. Larsen's category pages carry 151 to 166 unique internal links, yours carry 142 to 176. You link plenty. The links simply point at pages that are not built to rank.
Backlinks and authority Not the cause Ten Domain Rating points, 38 against 48. Real, but nowhere near enough to explain a 38-fold difference in top-three rankings. You have genuine editorial coverage including Marie Claire Australia and Man of Many. The authority is there and it is not being converted.
Amount of content Half true You have published 127 articles, so the effort has been made. But Larsen's pages average 3,112 words against your 2,288, and more importantly theirs are organised as documents while yours are product grids. It is the shape of the content, not the quantity.

The evidence, page by page

Matched pages, crawled the same day
TargetSiteWordsH1sH2sH3sFAQSchema on the page
Emerald cut engagement ringsLarsen4,01313328YesWebPage, FAQPage, Question, BreadcrumbList, LocalBusiness
You2,67832811NoCollectionPage, BreadcrumbList, Organization
Oval engagement ringsLarsen3,93813528YesWebPage, FAQPage, Question, BreadcrumbList, LocalBusiness
You2,8283449NoCollectionPage, BreadcrumbList, Organization
Lab grown diamond ringsLarsen3,46312631YesWebPage, FAQPage, Question, BreadcrumbList, LocalBusiness
You2,14023710NoCollectionPage, BreadcrumbList, Organization
Engagement rings (top category)Larsen4,19313528YesWebPage, FAQPage, Question, BreadcrumbList, LocalBusiness
You1,6902219NoCollectionPage, BreadcrumbList, Organization
Wedding rings (top category)Larsen3,54513526NoWebPage, BreadcrumbList, LocalBusiness
You2,90021510NoCollectionPage, BreadcrumbList, Organization

Live crawl, 11 August 2026. Note the schema column: Larsen puts LocalBusiness on every page, you put it on none of your category pages. For a business whose whole advantage is a Sydney showroom you can walk into, that is a signal worth having. Live crawl

What each site's best pages actually earn
PageVisits / moKeywordsBest pos.Top keyword
Larsen · /engagement-rings6,3602872engagement rings australia
Larsen · /engagement-rings/melbourne2,518492engagement rings melbourne
Larsen · /engagement-rings/diamond1,4601562diamond engagement rings
Larsen · /engagement-rings/oval-cut1,361832oval engagement rings
Larsen · /engagement-rings/emerald-cut738971emerald cut engagement rings australia
 
You · /engagement-rings/aquamarine207434aquamarine ring
You · /bangles-bracelets/tennis-bracelet1452417tennis bracelet (30,000 a month)
You · /engagement-rings/emerald-cut-diamond48189emerald cut diamond engagement ring
You · /engagement-rings48411emerald cut diamond ring
You · /engagement-rings/pear-cut-diamond58128pear shaped engagement ring

Ahrefs, Australian market, 11 August 2026. Look at the keywords column rather than the traffic column: that is the mechanism. One well-built hub earns rankings for dozens or hundreds of related searches. A product grid earns a handful. Ahrefs

How the two sites are laid out
StructureLarsenYouWhy it matters
URLs in sitemap3,0642,014Comparable size
Education hub48 pages, tree3 pagesWhere AI answers get sourced
Blog639, under /blog/127, at the rootNo hub means no topical parent
City pages60The national market
Engagement ring hubs5233Closer than you would think
Guide and comparison pagesYesNoneCaptures research-stage buyers
Service pages70Remodelling ranks first for them
Overlapping taxonomiesNo5 competingYour pages compete with each other
Crawl control on thin pagesBlocks /product/All exposed1,612 of your pages earn nothing

What we would do about it

In order, cheapest and highest-leverage first. This is the "own your territories" phase of the transformation, made specific.

OrderMoveWhat it involves and why it is first
1Fix the H1 templateOne template change removes the empty H1 and demotes "Filter By:" to what it is. Every category page on the site inherits it. This is hours of work, not months, and it is currently undermining all 2,014 pages.
2Add FAQ and Review schemaYou already have the questions: 136 of them, mapped in the research. Answer the top ones on each category page and mark them up. This is the clearest AEO signal there is and you currently have none of it.
3Rebuild the top ten category hubs as documentsEngagement rings, lab grown, and the eight biggest shapes. Give each one a real body with sub-sections, not just a product grid: what the cut is, who it suits, how to choose, what it costs, what you do differently. Larsen's version of this page ranks for 287 keywords.
4Build the education treeThe 4Cs, the shapes, the metals, the gemstones, ring sizing, care. This is the territory with 4,730 searches a month where you hold three pages, and where an actual master jeweller has an unfair advantage over a chain.
5Build the city and remote pagesMelbourne, Brisbane, Perth, Adelaide, Canberra, plus how a Zoom consultation works. This is the national business in content form, and Larsen is currently taking that traffic unopposed.
6Tidy the taxonomy and control the crawlCollapse the five overlapping category paths, give the 127 articles a hub, and stop offering Google 1,612 pages that earn nothing.
The encouraging part. Not one of these six needs a link-building campaign, a rebuild, or years of waiting. You already have the authority, the products, the photography, the articles and the showroom. Larsen is not doing anything you cannot do. They have simply built pages that answer questions, and pointed them at the whole country instead of one suburb.

Where these numbers come from